The preference of one alternative out of the three based on economic criteria by using the present worth, equivalent annual cost, benefit-cost ratio and rate of return methods.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

100%

Chapter 13, Problem 14P

To determine

The preference of one alternative out of the three based on economic criteria by using the present worth, equivalent annual cost, benefit-cost ratio and rate of return methods.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 14P

Alternative 3- Intersection widening

Explanation of Solution

Given:

Analysis period = 20 years

Annual interest rate = 15 percent

Traffic and Highway Engineering, Chapter 13, Problem 14P

Calculation:

Determine the present worth of alternative 1 (Traffic signals):

PW1=−340,000−(10,000+450,000)(P/A−15−20)+25,000(P/F−15−20)(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26(P/F−15−20)=1 ( 1+i )n=1 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=0.0611PW1=−340,000−(10,000+450,000)(6.26)+25,000(0.0611) =$−3218072.50

Determine the present worth of alternative 2 (Intersection widening):

PW2=−850,000−(5,000+300,000)(P/A−15−20)+12,000(P/F−15−20)(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26(P/F−15−20)=1 ( 1+i )n=1 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=0.0611PW2=−850,000−(5,000+300,000)(6.26)+12,000(0.0611) =$−2758566.80

Determine the present worth of alternative 3 (Grade separation):

PW3=−2,120,000−(5,000+225,000)(P/A−15−20)(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26PW3=−2,120,000−(5,000+225,000)(6.26) =$−3559800

The project with the highest present worth is alternative 2.

Determine the equivalent annual cost of alternative 1 (Traffic signals):

EUAW=NPW[i ( 1+i ) n ( 1+i ) n−1]EUAW1=−3218072.50 [0.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20 ( 1+0.15 ) 20−1]EUAW1=$−514891.60

Determine the equivalent annual cost of alternative 2 (Intersection widening):

EUAW=NPW[i ( 1+i ) n ( 1+i ) n−1]EUAW2=−2758566.80 [0.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20 ( 1+0.15 ) 20−1]EUAW2=$−441370.688

Determine the equivalent annual cost of alternative 3 (Grade separation):

EUAW=NPW[i ( 1+i ) n ( 1+i ) n−1]EUAW3=−3559800 [0.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20 ( 1+0.15 ) 20−1]EUAW3=$−569568

The project with the highest equivalent annual costis alternative 2.

Determine the benefit-cost ratioof alternative 1 (Traffic signals):

BCR1=−( 10,000+450,000)( P/A−15−20)+25,000( P/F−15−20)−340,000(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26(P/F−15−20)=1 ( 1+i )n=1 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=0.0611BCR1=−2878072.5−340,000=8.465

Determine the benefit-cost ratio of alternative 2 (Intersection widening):

BCR2=−( 5,000+300,000)( P/A−15−20)+12,000( P/F−15−20)−850,000(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26(P/F−15−20)=1 ( 1+i )n=1 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=0.0611BCR2=−1908566.8−850,000=2.245>1

Since BCR >1, we would select Alternative 2.

Determine the benefit-cost ratio of alternative 3 (Grade separation):

BCR3=−( 5,000+225,000)( P/A−15−20)−2,120,000(P/A−15−20)= ( 1+i )n−1i ( 1+i )n= ( 1+0.15 ) 20−10.15 ( 1+0.15 ) 20=6.26BCR3=−1439800−2,120,000=0.68<1

Since BCR is less than 1, we would not select Alternative 3

Determine the benefit-cost ratio of alternative 2 with respect to 1:

BCR2−1=1,908,566.8−2,878,072.5850,000−340,000 =1.9

We reachthe same conclusion as previously, which is to select Alternative 2

Determine the rate of return (ROR)of alternative 1versus 2:

NPW=0=(850,000−340,000)−(5,000+150,000)(P/A−i−20)+(25,000−12,000)(P/F−i−20)

It is very difficult to solve this explicitly for i. By trial and error, we can easily find the i that makes the right side of the equation equal to the left side.

510,000=−155,000(P/A−i−20)+13,000(P/F−i−20)

Try i=30 %,

−155,000(P/A−30−20)+13,000(P/F−30−20)=513911.62

For i=31 %

−155,000(P/A−31−20)+13,000(P/F−31−20)=497684.2512

Then, we can try i=30.5 % and by interpolation 30.237 % is the rate of return to make the left side to equal to the right side.

Since ROR is greater than 15 percent, we select Alternative 2

Determine the rate of return (ROR) of alternative 3 versus 1:

NPW=0=(2,120,000−340,000)−(5,000+225,000)(P/A−i−20)+(25,000−0)(P/F−i−20)

By trial and error, we can easily find the i that makes the right side of the equation equal to the left side.

1,780,000=−230,000(P/A−i−20)+25,000(P/F−i−20)

Try i=11 %,

−230,000(P/A−11−20)+25,000(P/F−11−20)=1828464.62

For i=12 %

−230,000(P/A−12−20)+25,000(P/F−12−20)=1715277.50

By interpolation 11.428 % is the rate of return to make the left side to equal to the right side.

Since the ROR is lower than 15 percent, we discard Alternative 3.

Conclusion:

The second alternative i.e. Intersection widening is selected by using the three economic methods.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Three designs have been proposed to improve traffic flow at a major intersection in a heavily traveled suburban area. The first alternative involves improved traffic signaling. The second alternative includes traffic-signal improvements and intersection widening for exclusive left turns. The third alternative includes extensive reconstruction, including a grade separation structure. The construction costs, as well as annual maintenance and user costs, are listed in the following table for each alternative. Determine which alternative is preferred based on economic criteria if the analysis period is 20 years and the annual interest rate is 15%. Show that the result is the same using the present worth, equivalent annual cost, benefit–cost ratio, and rate-of-return methods. Alternatives Capital Cost ($) Annual Maintence ($) Annual User Cost ($) Salvage Value ($) Present Condition 0 15,000 600,000 0 Traffic Signal 340,000 10,000 450,000 25,000 Intersection Widening 850,000 5,000…

Three designs have been proposed to improve traffic flow at a major intersection in a heavily traveled suburban area. The first alternative involves improved traffic signaling. The second alternative includes traffic-signal improvements and intersection widening for exclusive left turns. The third alternative includes extensive reconstruction, including a grade separation structure. The construction costs, as well as annual maintenance and user costs, are listed in the following table for each alternative. Determine which alternative is preferred based on economic criteria if the analysis period is 20 years and the annual interest rate is 15%. Show that the result is the same using the present worth, equivalent annual cost, benefit–cost ratio, and rate-of-return methods.

The City of Gainesville and FDOT, in an attempt to proactively address the growing need for capacity in the western area of Gainesville, has identified a potential alignment for a new freeway to UF campus. The FDOT district has contracted you to design this new freeway and identify any additional concerns with this potential freeway. Note that this is an open question, and you may need to make the following assumptions during your work: Lane width (e.g., 12 ft. or 11 ft) Shoulder width (e.g., 6 ft.) Interchange density (e.g., 1 interchange/2 miles) Number of lanes (e.g., 3 or 2 lanes each direction) Hourly volume V= * D*AADT (e.g., =10%, directional distribution D=50%) A design structural number (e.g., SN= 5.0) The following traffic characteristics are expected on this freeway: AADT=30,000 veh PHF=0.95 85% passenger cars Two 2-kip single axles 7% RVs One 10-kip single axle One 24-kip tandem axle 5% single-unit trucks One 12-kip single axle Two 32-kip tandem axles 3% tractor-trailer…

Answer 2