Suppose MAC functions for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, are MAC₁= 60-2E and MAC₂-48-3E2 respectively. (i) Suggest the (socially) cost-effective way to set emission standards for the two firms to reduce their combined level of emissions to 20 units. [Note that we want only 20 units of emissions from the two firms at the end.] (ii) What is the sum of the abatement costs (or total social compliance costs) when emissions are reduced from the two firms to 20 units in the socially cost-effective manner by using emission standards. [This is related to part (i).] (iii) What emission tax rate applied simulataneously to the two firms reduces the combined level of emissions to 20 units from the two firms just as the cost-effective way to set standards? [This question needs to answered based on your answer(s) to part (ii).]

Suppose MAC functions for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2, are MAC₁= 60-2E and MAC₂-48-3E2 respectively. (i) Suggest the (socially) cost-effective way to set emission standards for the two firms to reduce their combined level of emissions to 20 units. [Note that we want only 20 units of emissions from the two firms at the end.] (ii) What is the sum of the abatement costs (or total social compliance costs) when emissions are reduced from the two firms to 20 units in the socially cost-effective manner by using emission standards. [This is related to part (i).] (iii) What emission tax rate applied simulataneously to the two firms reduces the combined level of emissions to 20 units from the two firms just as the cost-effective way to set standards? [This question needs to answered based on your answer(s) to part (ii).]

Micro Economics For Today

10th Edition

ISBN:9781337613064

Author:Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:Tucker, Irvin B.

Chapter14: Environmental Economics

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17SQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

cap-and-trade and windfall profitsA city called Seoul is suffering from high concentrations of mercury in the air, caused by burningcoal in power plants. There are two of these plants close to the city. The city’s mayor wants touse cap-and-trade to reduce emissions to a reportedly “safe” level of 60 tons. The two firms havethe following marginal benefits of emissions: MB1 = 100 – 2e1, MB2 = 25 – 0.5e2.a. How much mercury will each firm emit? What allowance price will prevail in themarket?Firm 2 hires a smart lobbyist who convinces the government that its profits are relatively low andthat it therefore deserves a generous allowance allocation. The government agrees and allocatesa1 = 20 allowances to firm 1 (for free) and a2 = 40 allowances to firm 2 (for free).b. What are the firms’ profits? Do any of the firms earn windfall profits? [Hint: compareprofits with and without regulation.] Windfall profits have been sharply criticized by consumer advocacy groups and politicians.c. What can…
Suppose there are only two polluting firms, called A and B, with the following marginal abatement costs: MACA=160 2- e and MACB=100-es, where e represents firm A's emissions in tons and ea represents firm B's emissions in tons. Suppose the government wishes to ensure that the two firms together emit 60 tons of the pollutant and uses a Tradable Emission Permit (TEP) policy. Assume that each TEP allows its holder to emit 1 ton, and that the market for permits is perfectly competitive. a. Suppose the government initially distributes the total number of TEPs it issues equally between the two firms. The permits are distributed free of charge. Once trade in permits takes place, what will be the equilibrium in the market for TEPS (i.e. which firm will buy how many TEPs from the other, and at what price)? b. Briefly describe three problems of setting up a TEP market.
Marginal Abatement Costs: The marginal abatement costs of three firms are provided in the table below on page 109. Each firm is emitting now 10 tons/week. Therefore, the total emission of all firms is 30 tons/week. Suppose that society wants to reduce the level of emission by 50%, to 15 tons/week. Calculate the total cost of reducing the level of emission to 15 tons/week Assuming equiproportionate decrease in emissions which of the following is correct: 69 96 100 Assuming equimarginal decrease in emissions which of the following is correct: 69 96 100
The table below gives the marginal abatement costs of three polluting firms in an industry. The industry is regulated with an emission tax of $6. Marginal abatements costs ($/ton) Emissions (tons/week) 10 Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 0 0 2 3 4 2 12 3 18 4. 5 10 24 4 12 36 6. 3 14 60 18 72 8. 23 84 29 108 10 a. What level of emissions does each firm choose? Explain how they respond to the emissions tax. b. What are cach firm's total compliance costs? Show your work. c. What is the total level of abatement? Discuss whether this abatement is achieved at the least cost for society.
Explain the difference between regulating emissions via fees vs. standards. Which of the two would be more efficient if there are large differences between the firms’ marginal costs of abatement.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 18-2E_1 MAC 2 = 12-E2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E Agg E_1+E_2) is: MED = 5E Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E Agg), the government institutes a perunit subsidy to abatement. The total (or combined) subsidy payment to the two firms is $_
The primary source of air pollution in the small town of Smokey, Nevada is a nearby steel mill. The local environmental agency has decided that the mill needs to reduce its emissions because the town's population is located directly downwind from it. Currently the agency is considering three different approaches to reducing pollution from the mill: a technology standard, an emission standard and an emission tax. Why might the owner of the mill prefer an emission standard to a technology standard that would produce the same level of emissions? a Because with emission standards the polluter is more flexible in selecting the technology that will minimize her abatement cost Ob. Because polluters usually try to stick to their existing technology O C. Because it has been proven to be easier to implement O d. Because polluters, as all producers are suspicious about new technologies
Consider a firm that emits pollution into the air. Suppose that the marginal damage costs associated with the emissions are given by MDC -15+ 4 c, where e is the quantity of the emissions. The firm's marginal costs of abatement are given by (a) (b) 390 (c) MAC 1200 - 20 c. Determine the quantity of emissions that the firm would discharge in the absence of government policy. Determine the socially efficient level of emissions. Calculate the total costs to society for both a and b and draw a diagram illustrating these costs.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions: MAC1 = 7 - E1 %3D MAC2 = 14 - 2E2 Assume that marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (EA = E1+E2) is: MED = 0.5EA To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions EA* using a per-unit tax on emissions, the government should set the tax equal to $.
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 12 - .5E_1 MAC_2 = 12 - E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = (1/3)E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit tax on emissions. The per-unit tax on emissions is $____.
Consider the following graph that shows the marginal abatement cost (MAC) curve for a coal power plan for reducing local air pollution and the marginal damage (MD) curve for those living around the coal power plant. MD (E) MAC (E b. Emissions E-0 E EL E-Max AMax Or Abatement E A-0 What are the total abatement costs at E' (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as "a+b+c+d+e+f", without the quotation marks. What are the total abatement costs at E-0 (enter your answer with the letters and "+" signs as as "a+b+c+d+c+f", without the quotation marks. If the property rights were with the coal power plant how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following, "E-0", "E", "E1", "E-Max") If the property rights were with the people how much Emissions would we see? (enter one of the following. "E-0", "E", "E1 "E-Max") What is the socially optimal level of emissions (choose from one of the following and enter as written without the quotation marks, "E-0". "E"E1 "E-Max").
Consider two firms with the following marginal abatement costs (MAC) as a function of emissions (E): MAC_1 = 12-.5E_1 MAC_2 = 12-E_2, and assume marginal external damages (MED) from the aggregate emissions of both firms (E_Agg = E_1 + E_2) is: MED = (1/3)E_Agg. To achieve the socially efficient level of aggregate emissions (E*_Agg), the government institutes a per unit tax on emissions. The per- unit tax on emissions is $ Answer: