For each of the three cases presented, you must cover the following topics: Background Information o Title of case oDate of case o Court(s) in which the case was ultimately decided o Type of case Facts of the case. Legal issue to be decided Contentions of BOTH parties in the case. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision. Implications of the verdict for either psychological practice, legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general The trick here is to make the cases accessible to everyone. Most court cases are filled with "legalese" (another name for legal terminology that is difficult to understand for non-lawyers). However, the hard part is converting the cases to plain language without dumbing down the content. Think to yourself "how would the average person need this case explained for them to understand it the first time they hear it. Remember, your listeners have not spent the time reviewing the cases that you have and only have one shot to hear, and understand, what happened.

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
icon
Related questions
Question
1:09
< Notes
•Right to refuse psychiatric treatment
o Application of the President and Directors of
Georgetown College Incorporated (1964)
o Rennie v. Klein (1983)
o Sell v. United States (2003)
93
For each of the three cases presented, you must
cover the following topics: Background
Information o Title of case oDate of case o
Court(s) in which the case was ultimately
decided o Type of case Facts of the case.
Legal issue to be decided Contentions of
BOTH parties in the case. Decision of the court
and reasoning behind that decision.
Implications of the verdict for either
psychological practice, legal practice, law
enforcement, or society in general
The trick here is to make the cases accessible to
everyone. Most court cases are filled with
"legalese" (another name for legal terminology
that is difficult to understand for non-lawyers).
However, the hard part is converting the cases
to plain language without dumbing down the
content. Think to yourself "how would the
average person need this case explained for
them to understand it the first time they hear it.
Remember, your listeners have not spent the
time reviewing the cases that you have and only
have one shot to hear, and understand, what
happened.
O-
O
Transcribed Image Text:1:09 < Notes •Right to refuse psychiatric treatment o Application of the President and Directors of Georgetown College Incorporated (1964) o Rennie v. Klein (1983) o Sell v. United States (2003) 93 For each of the three cases presented, you must cover the following topics: Background Information o Title of case oDate of case o Court(s) in which the case was ultimately decided o Type of case Facts of the case. Legal issue to be decided Contentions of BOTH parties in the case. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision. Implications of the verdict for either psychological practice, legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general The trick here is to make the cases accessible to everyone. Most court cases are filled with "legalese" (another name for legal terminology that is difficult to understand for non-lawyers). However, the hard part is converting the cases to plain language without dumbing down the content. Think to yourself "how would the average person need this case explained for them to understand it the first time they hear it. Remember, your listeners have not spent the time reviewing the cases that you have and only have one shot to hear, and understand, what happened. O- O
Should cover
i. Information provided
1. Background information
2. Facts of the case
following criteria:
3. Legal issue to be decided
4. Contentions of BOTH parties
5. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision
(5
6. Implications of the verdict for either psychological
practice,
legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general
iii. Clarity of information... getting rid of the "legalese"
Transcribed Image Text:Should cover i. Information provided 1. Background information 2. Facts of the case following criteria: 3. Legal issue to be decided 4. Contentions of BOTH parties 5. Decision of the court and reasoning behind that decision (5 6. Implications of the verdict for either psychological practice, legal practice, law enforcement, or society in general iii. Clarity of information... getting rid of the "legalese"
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning