Find PA, MA for A = What about over Q? Justify your answers. 01 2 1 2 0 over R. Is A diagonalisable? 2 0 1 Select one: O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − 2)(x² + x + 3) which does not factor further, and A ‡ 213 so mд = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is not diagonalisable. The same holds over Q. O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x + 2)(x − √√3)² but (A +213)(A - √√313) = 0 so mÃ₁ = (x + 2)(x − √√3) and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we have PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 2x + 3) which does not factorise further and A 213 so m₁ = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so not diagonalisable. O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − √2)(x² + x - 3) which factors further to give 3 distinct real roots. Hence m₁ = PA and A is diagonalisable. Over there are no roots at all so mA = PA but A is not diagonalisable. O Over R we obtain pÃ(x) = (x − 3)(x − √√3)(x + √√3) which has 3 distinct roots. So m = PA and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we just have PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 3) which does not factorise further and A‡ 313 so mA = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is not diagonalisable. None of the others apply O

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter3: Functions And Graphs
Section3.3: Lines
Problem 74E
icon
Related questions
Question
Find PA, MA for A =
What about over Q?
Justify your answers.
01 2
1 2 0 over R. Is A diagonalisable?
2
0 1
Select one:
O
Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − 2)(x² + x + 3) which does not factor further, and A ‡ 213 so mд = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is
not diagonalisable. The same holds over Q.
O
Over R we obtain P(x) = (x + 2)(x − √√3)² but (A +213)(A - √√313) = 0 so mÃ₁ = (x + 2)(x − √√3) and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we have
PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 2x + 3) which does not factorise further and A 213 so m₁ = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so not
diagonalisable.
O
Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − √2)(x² + x - 3) which factors further to give 3 distinct real roots. Hence m₁ = PA and A is diagonalisable. Over there
are no roots at all so mA = PA but A is not diagonalisable.
O Over R we obtain pÃ(x) = (x − 3)(x − √√3)(x + √√3) which has 3 distinct roots. So m = PA and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we just have
PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 3) which does not factorise further and A‡ 313 so mA = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is not diagonalisable.
None of the others apply
O
Transcribed Image Text:Find PA, MA for A = What about over Q? Justify your answers. 01 2 1 2 0 over R. Is A diagonalisable? 2 0 1 Select one: O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − 2)(x² + x + 3) which does not factor further, and A ‡ 213 so mд = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is not diagonalisable. The same holds over Q. O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x + 2)(x − √√3)² but (A +213)(A - √√313) = 0 so mÃ₁ = (x + 2)(x − √√3) and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we have PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 2x + 3) which does not factorise further and A 213 so m₁ = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so not diagonalisable. O Over R we obtain P(x) = (x − √2)(x² + x - 3) which factors further to give 3 distinct real roots. Hence m₁ = PA and A is diagonalisable. Over there are no roots at all so mA = PA but A is not diagonalisable. O Over R we obtain pÃ(x) = (x − 3)(x − √√3)(x + √√3) which has 3 distinct roots. So m = PA and A is diagonalisable. But over Q we just have PA(x) = (x − 3)(x² - 3) which does not factorise further and A‡ 313 so mA = PA is not the product of distinct linear factors, so A is not diagonalisable. None of the others apply O
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer