4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality, the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: United Fried Cheese Co. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,750,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Cash Flow $375,000 Year 2 -$125,000 Year 3 Year 4 $400,000 $475,000 United Fried Cheese Co.'s WACC is 10%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR). ○ -16.10% -19.32% -15.29% ○ -14.49% If United Fried Cheese Co.'s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should this independent project.

4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality, the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: United Fried Cheese Co. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,750,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Cash Flow $375,000 Year 2 -$125,000 Year 3 Year 4 $400,000 $475,000 United Fried Cheese Co.'s WACC is 10%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR). ○ -16.10% -19.32% -15.29% ○ -14.49% If United Fried Cheese Co.'s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should this independent project.

Essentials Of Investments

11th Edition

ISBN:9781260013924

Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PS

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $500,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 –100,000 Year 3 450,000 Year 4 450,000 Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s WACC is 9%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 22.81% 18.25% 21.67% 20.53%
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Celestial Crane Cosmetics is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $3,000,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Celestial Crane Cosmetics's WACC is 7%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR): O-20.94% O 17.35% Cash Flow $275,000 -125,000 400,000 450,000 O 19.00% O 15.69%
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR. Consider the following situation: Grey Fox Aviation Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $3,225,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Grey Fox Aviation Company's WACC is 8%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 16.25% 13.69% $325,000 -150,000 450,000 475,000 14.54% -20.05% If Grey Fox Aviation Company's managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should Which of the following statements about the relationship between the IRR and the MIRR is…
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Grey Fox Aviation Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $450,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 –175,000 Year 3 475,000 Year 4 450,000 Grey Fox Aviation Company’s WACC is 10%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 26.73% 27.89% 20.92% 23.24% If Grey Fox Aviation Company’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they shouldreject this independent…
Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,225,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $350,000 Year 2 –125,000 Year 3 450,000 Year 4 450,000 Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s WACC is 7%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): -12.63% 26.46% 30.64% 29.24% If Green Caterpillar Garden Supplies Inc.’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion,…
4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project's IRR Consider the following situation: Cold Goose Metal Works Inc. is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $600,000. The project's expected cash flows are: Year Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Cold Goose Metal Works Inc.'s WACC is 7%, and the project has the same risk as the firm's average project. Calculate this project's modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 17.50% 14.00% Cash Flow $350,000 -100,000 450,000 400,000 19.25%
Which of the following statements is correct regarding the payback method? Takes account of differences in size among projects. If a project’s payback is positive, then the project should be accepted because it must have a zero NPV. Ignores cash flows beyond the payback period. Has an objective, market-determined benchmark for making decisions. Directly account for the time value of money.
Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Grey Fox Aviation Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $2,225,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $325,000 Year 2 –100,000 Year 3 475,000 Year 4 475,000 Q1. Grey Fox Aviation Company’s WACC is 9%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 33.79% 29.18% -11.55% 27.65% If Grey Fox Aviation Company’s managers select projects based on the MIRR criterion, they should Q2. ______ this…
All parts are under one question therefore per your policy, all parts can be answered in full. 4. Modified internal rate of return (MIRR) The IRR evaluation method assumes that cash flows from the project are reinvested at the same rate equal to the IRR. However, in reality the reinvested cash flows may not necessarily generate a return equal to the IRR. Thus, the modified IRR approach makes a more reasonable assumption other than the project’s IRR. Consider the following situation: Fuzzy Button Clothing Company is analyzing a project that requires an initial investment of $3,000,000. The project’s expected cash flows are: Year Cash Flow Year 1 $300,000 Year 2 –175,000 Year 3 425,000 Year 4 500,000 A. Fuzzy Button Clothing Company’s WACC is 8%, and the project has the same risk as the firm’s average project. Calculate this project’s modified internal rate of return (MIRR): 21.07% 20.19% -19.29% 14.93% B. If…
Which of the following is correct? • the shorter a projects payback period, the less desirable the project is normally considered to be by this criterion • one drawback of the payback criterion is that this method does not take account of cash flows beyond the payback period. • if a projects payback is postitive, then the project should be accepted because it must have a positive NPV • the regular payback ignores cash flows beyond the payback period, but the discounted payback method overcomes this problem •one drawback of the discounted payback is that this method does not consider the time value of money, while the regular payback overcomes this drawback.
Which of the following is CORRECT? Select one: a. If the NPV of a project is negative, the IRR for the project must also be negative. b. A project's MIRR can never exceed its IRR. c. If a project with normal cash flows has an IRR less than WACC, the project must have a positive NPV. d. If Project 1's IRR exceeds Project 2's IRR, then 1 must have a higher NPV than 2. e. If a project with normal cash flows has an IRR greater than WACC, the project must have a positive NPV. You purchase a house for $250,000. After you make your down payment of $50,000, you are financing $200,000 for 30 years at an annual percentage rate of 5.4%. How much are your monthly payments? Select one: a. Less than $1,000 b. Between $1,000 and $1,050 c. Between $1,050 and $1,100 d. Between $1,100 and $1,150 e. Greater than $1,200
Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Assume that the project being considered has normal cash flows, with one outflow followed by a series of inflows. Select one: a. The lower the WACC used to calculate it, the lower the calculated NPV will be. b. If a project's NPV is greater than zero, then its IRR must be less than zero. c. The NPV of a relatively low-risk project should be found using a relatively high WACC. d. A project's NPV is found by compounding the cash inflows at the IRR to find the terminal value (TV), then discounting the TV at the WACC. e. If a project's NPV is less than zero, then its IRR must be less than the WACC.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Essentials Of Investments

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013924

Author:

Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.

Publisher:

Mcgraw-hill Education,

FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE

Finance

ISBN:

9781260013962

Author:

BREALEY

Publisher:

RENT MCG

Financial Management: Theory & Practice

Finance

ISBN:

9781337909730

Author:

Brigham

Publisher:

Cengage

Foundations Of Finance

Finance

ISBN:

9780134897264

Author:

KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William

Publisher:

Pearson,

Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…

Finance

ISBN:

9781337395250

Author:

Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…

Finance

ISBN:

9780077861759

Author:

Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS