The United states should not have joined the league of nations in 1919. The United States shouldn’t have joined the league of nations because we would be supplying the troops and food a lot and not getting anything out of it, and we were in no danger of an attack. The U.S has oceans between them and the countries they are against, so they are in no fear of being attacked. This means that if any other country were attacked, the US would have to send troops, food, and supplies. This is bad because we are in no fear of being attacked so we would have to send troops and supplies without getting anything out of it. World War one was a European war, The United States didn’t need to get involved, we lost 115,000 soldiers in World War one and if
In addition, Hitler learnt that the League of Nations, itself a creation of the Treaty of Versailles failed to ensure collective security, and could possibly do nothing to impede his actions. The most crucial factor is that Woodrow Wilson himself, the creator of the League of Nations, was not allowed to join it by the Congress. Also, it proved to be ineffective at various occasions. It was first unsuccessful in 1931 during the Manchurian Crisis. The League of Nations sent a committee to investigate the situation and concluded that Japan had violated China’s security. Although they condemned Japan’s actions, there was not much Britain or
People have been debating over this topic for a long time. There are two good sides with reasons if the United States should have joined the World War II. In my opinion, the United States should have joined the World War II because the United States was being invaded by the Nazi because they were mad at America. The Nazi were also trying to rule all of Germany and we couldn't let that go and let them win right after they bombed the United States. This is why we should of joined World War II.
The league of nations was created by the winners of WWI and was intended to prevent future world wars. The idea was created by the US president Woodrow Wilson. The League of Nations was supposed to be a council that included all the world nations to discuss topics and keep peace. This organization failed in stopping WWII. The League had multiple opportunities to stop the second world war, but failed miserably. The League of Nations had very limited authority on countries such as Japan, Italy, Germany and the USSR. “The main weapon of the League was to ask member countries to stop trading with aggressive countries”(Wheeler). The League of Nations was treated as a joke and could not enforce any of the rules that they set. The League had no authority because they had no army to threaten the aggressive countries. Additionally, countries such as Italy and Germany were not part of the League and therefore had no obligation to listen to them or make peace talks. If the League was set up in a better format and way to work it would not have failed and they could have been able to stop the second world
• The United States Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, making it impossible for the United States to join the League of Nations.
The U.S is mainly a neutral country but if something happens they are not afraid to fight back. After the Japanese bombings on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii on December 7,1941 the U.S began to take part in the war. WW11 was the deadliest war in the history of the world and it was also the most significant. 12 countries participated in WW11 including America. Because of the amount of casualties and history the war has it is easy to say that is was the most important war the U.S has ever been involved in. America’s involvement is also one of the reason the war was ended because we had so much power. Things could have been much different in this world if America did not partake in the war.
This fostered a strong desire to return to isolationism, as demonstrated by President Harding’s “return to normalcy.” One of the first steps was to reject involvement in the League of Nations, a post-World War I body meant to ensure collective peace and security. Many Americans did not want to become involved in European affairs and risk being pulled into another global war, which they feared would be inevitable if the United States joined the League of Nations. In a speech, Presidential Candidate Warren G. Harding stated, “My position at present is that the League strikes a deadly blow at our constitutional integrity and surrenders to a dangerous extent of our independence as a nation,” (Doc A). Nevertheless, the United States did participate in multiple international events at the beginning of the 1920s, including the
I believe America’s involvement with World War I was justified. America’s entry into WWI started because of a violation that the Germans broke, this violation was the usage of war submarines in the Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea. Another important incentive of America’s involvement was Germany’s attempt to entice Mexico to revolt against America. Because of these actions of the Germans, it led president Wilson to declare war.
The League of Nations was an organization created following the year after the concession of World War I in 1918. The purpose of this union was to maintain world stability and peace. The League of Nations was proposed by President Woodrow Wilson in his Fourteen Points and was considered relatively controversial. Congress had to vote upon whether the United States would join or not. Two of the Senators gave speeches, Senator Gilbert Hitchcock and Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, advocating their parties’ views.
I feel like the U.S. should not have joined World War 1. I think the reasons we joined the war were not big enough reasons to send our soldiers to war over. I believe our reasons for joining the war are good reasons, but still not good enough to send people into battle to lose their lives for.
### appears to be part of Esssay 384218##World War 1, also known as The Great War, is the fifth-deadliest conflict in history. It was mainly a battle for independence between countries, and until April 6, 1917 the U.S. had tried to pull away from it. Only about 20% of America had actually wanted to get involved, while about 80% had voted against any American involvement. When the American passenger boat known as the Lusitania had been destroyed by German U-boats and the Germans had broken their promise of not destroying any more American ships, there truly was no choice but to fight with the Allies against the Central Powers. The pros and cons of entering this war are very debatable, yet quite factual when basing them on life in this time period. Three pro arguments that were relevant would be that the Germans needed to be stopped, that the war would actually lead to peace, and that it had certainly improved our nation. Three con arguments could be that the Great Depression was pushed with the U.S. being involved, that the Allies really didn’t need America’s assistance, and that people believed that this war would not lead to peace at all.
Throughout the course of history, World War 1 was known as one of the worst wars out of all the wars. Though it was one of the worst, the United States had contributed to the Allied war effort during WW1. The United States had contributed to the Allied war with plenty of men, weaponry, ammunitions, machinery, and also providing a major moral boost for the men who were already engaged in the battle. America had also played an important role that had determined the outcome of this major conflict.
As seen in Document A, William Borah stated that the League is essentially creating more problems to solve problems. He said that shouldn't we want a League run by Americans who have the same values and ideals rather than delegates from foreign countries? In Document B, it is stated that, “The Treaty of Versailles…it does much to intensify and nothing to heal the old and ugly dissensions.” It was common knowledge and a wide held belief that the United States should remain neutral in foreign matters. The American citizens knew about Washington's Farewell Address and how it stated that we would stay out of the business of foreign
Based on the speeches President Woodrow Wilson and Senator George W. gave in 1917 during World War one and from what I have learned in class, I believe that the United States should have entered World War One. First and foremost, Germany wanted America into the war so badly. Germany started to attack the America’s ships; on May 7, 1917, 128 Americans and other 1201 passengers were killed in the British-owned ocean liner Lusitania, it was attacked without warning just off the coast of Ireland. Germany announced unrestricted sub warfare on all armed ships. Several U.S. ships going to Britain were damaged or sunk by German Mines. On February 3, 1917, is when the imperial Germany Government announced that German submarines would attack all ships approaching the ports controlled by enemies of Germany; it wanted to keep goods from reaching Britain. This was damaging the America international trades. If Germany did not want the United States in the war, they would only attack their enemies’ ships. Germany also gave the United
The League of Nations was established after World War One to keep peace, one of its functions was to uphold the Treaty of Versailles. This led a lot of people to feel that the League is a force representing the winners of the First World War against the Germans. This made people to connect it with the harshness of the Treaty and so led to a lack of trust in the League of Nations. For example the Germans were bitter that they had to accept the total blame for starting the war and hated the fact they had to pay reparations of £6,600,000,000 and didn't want anything that stood for it. Hitler saw all these weaknesses of the League and believed that if he invaded a country the League would be unable to stop him.
When the United States failed to join the League of Nations, it became one of the great miscalculations of the United State foreign policy in the twentieth century. Despite Woodrow Wilson’s “whistle – stop” tour to rally public support for the League treaty, the president was unable to muster enough backing to pressure the Senate to pass that piece of legislation. Over the years, scholars have attempted to explain how and why the treaty failed by looking at the Senate’s and President Wilson’s discourse.